Khwaja Hasan Nizami likened Krishna to Indian nationalism

Story by  Saquib Salim | Posted by  Aasha Khosa • 2 Years ago
Khwaja Hasan Nizami
Khwaja Hasan Nizami

 

 Saquib Salim

“In the greatness of Shri Krishna, lies the greatness of India. The belief that Shri Krishna was an avatar, and author of Gita, brings honour to the Indians. Don’t try to damage his position.”

Khwaja Hasan Nizami, an Islamic scholar from pre-partition India, wrote these words in his famous Urdu book Krishna Katha, a biography of Lord Shri Krishna.

75 years after gaining the independence from the colonial masters it is unthinkable for most of us that a Muslim, let alone an Islamic scholar, would heap praises upon Shri Krishna, a Hindu god. In the days before the colonial divide and rule policy would reach its zenith during the partition, for centuries, Muslims eulogized Hindu gods and goddesses in their poetries.

Poetry in praise of Shri Krishna by Raskhan, a 16th century Muslim poet, is still recited across the country. Insha Allah Khan Insha, Hasrat Mohani, Hafiz Jalandhari, and Nazeer Akbarabadi are some of the prominent Muslim poets who have eulogized Shri Krishna in their writings. Many Muslim women like Raihana Tayyabji also wrote in praise of the Hindu god. There is a long tradition of respecting Shri Krishna as a philosopher, warrior and saint by Muslims.

When India was struggling for the freedom, Muslim thinkers looked towards Shri Krishna, and his teachings, as a source of inspiration. The stress was laid upon learning from the indigenous traditions and creating a national unity. Popular Urdu poet and Muslim thinker of early 20th century, Muhammad Iqbal writes:

Ye Aaya-e-Nau, Jail Se Nazil Huwi Mujh Par

Gita Mein Hai Quran To Quran Mein Geeta

(This new ‘verse’ was revealed to me from the jail that the Quran is in the Gita and the Gita is in the Quran)

Khwaja Hasan Nizami, in 1917, published, Krishna Biti later reprinted as Krishna Katha, a biography of Shri Krishna. Nizami wrote the book to dispel the misconceptions among Muslims in particular and Indians in general, regarding the life and character of Shri Krishna. At the very outset, he described Shri Krishna as a great man, who, through his life taught Indians the secrets of the spiritual and material world. In his opinion Shri Krishna was a human being but a godly human like messengers of Allah, in whom Muslims do believe. It is a duty of a Muslim, according to Nizami, to respect and propagate the ideas of wise people, no matter to what religion they belong to.

Nizami argued that there were prevalent misconceptions regarding Shri Krishna. The popular culture had portrayed him in a vulgar, light and colonial powers wanted to benefit from this narrative. The people should read about Shri Krishna, he argued, without prejudice. The teachings of Shri Krishna should not be learnt from the books published by the western educated writers but from the Hindus of India. His teachings are in the hearts of all Indians. The propaganda of colonial rulers and their stooges that Hindus did not have a civilization was a sham. The ancient living civilization had survived the test of the time. Like Iqbal, Nizami compared India with Greek, Roman and Egyptian civilizations to make atiquity. The ‘inferiority’ of the Hindus was a colonial propaganda to justify their inhuman imperialism.

Nizami further argued that he did not write the book as a Hindu but as an Indian. He identified himself as a devout Muslim. The land where his forefathers were buried was his Watan (homeland) and thus he considered writing about the teachings of the great men of the land his duty. He admitted that India is not a Hindu country but Hindus are the largest chunk of population. He writes, “By joining all the parts together, a unit is formed. I studied Hindu religion for 20 years, because they are also a part of this great nation like me.”

Khwaja Hasan Nizami with Allam Iqbal and other poets (Courtesy Twitter of Indian Muslim History)

Interestingly, Nizami equates the study and respect of Hinduism, its culture and civilization as an exercise in nation building.

The chapter describing the birth of Shri Krishna titled, Sachchai ka savera (Dawn of the truth), painted the event as a light after the long dark night. Much like his contemporary Urdu poet Hafiz Jalandhari, who called Shri Krishna, light of India (Bharat ke ujale), Nizami wrote that the darkness was withering away at the time of Shri Krishna’s birth. Nizami wrote, “Today is the birth of that army general and commander of India whose armies wandered over the subcontinent with their victorious flag. The most moral of all the army heads of the subcontinent opened his eyes today. The whole universe welcomes the arrival of him, who understood the secrets of earth and sky, taught Indians how to live through joy and sorrow, solitude and company, life and death. Master of the rich and beloved of the poor has been born. Listen attentively, welcome his arrival, Shri Krishna has taken birth.”

Nizami wrote that he wanted Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Parsis, Jews and Jains to respect each other's religious beliefs. How could a divided India dream of independence? People divided along religions and languages could not claim to be a nation. His motive while writing the book was, “The world has to be shown that we (Indians) are one people. This is possible only if we start respecting the religious heads and elders of each other, gain knowledge about them and talk about them with pride in front of of Non-Indian public. We should tell non-Indians, delightfully, that our Shri Krishna was like that, Shri Ram was like that, Akbar was like that or Shah Jahan was like that.”     

Nizami contradicted the claim made by authors of Arya Samaj, like Lala Lajpat Rai, that Shri Krishna was not an avatar and author of Gita. He said the entire Europe was mesmerized by Gita and people were celebrating Shri Krishna. The respect for Shri Krishna could not be separated from the respect for India and the Indians. Nizami wrote, “O Indians! do not dishonour your nation to gratify the foreigners… One should not strip elders of their legitimate attributes while trying to counsel the masses.”

In present times when divisive politics has overtaken every other ideological discourse it is important to remember that an Islamic scholar who termed respecting Shri Krishna as an important part of Indianness. The idea of acknowledging Shri Krishna as avatar did not contradict his idea of being a pious Muslim; rather it was an important aspect of his patriotism, which he believed to be a religious duty.

Saquib Salim is a Historian and a Writer